Usus and Fruitio in Augustine, 'De doctrina Christiana I'

Critique of R. Holte's interpretation (cf. Aph XXIX p.31) of Augustine's use-enjoyment distinction. The text does not support Holte's thesis beyond his demonstration of the importance of the parts of the soul, the practical and theoretical reason. Augustine does not derive the meaning of the pair fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserIn:Oliver O'Donovan
Veröffentlicht: S.n., s.l., 1982
Volumen:33
Seiten:361-397
Zeitschrift:The Journal of theological studies
Nummer:2
Format:Article
Thema:- Lebensbeschreibung > Verhältnisse und Quellen > [Stoïcisme] > [Stoïcisme]
- Werke > Vokabularstudien/Themen > Rubriken - lateinischen Wortschatz > F > Fruitio - Usus
- Werke > Vokabularstudien/Themen > Rubriken - lateinischen Wortschatz > U > [Usus / Fruito]
- Werke > Lehrwerke > De diversis quaestionibus 83 > div. qu. 83
- Werke > Lehrwerke > De doctrina christiana > doc. Chr. 1
- Doktrin > Von Mensch zu Gott > [Morale] > [Charité. Amitié] > [Charité/amour du prochain]
Status:Active
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Critique of R. Holte's interpretation (cf. Aph XXIX p.31) of Augustine's use-enjoyment distinction. The text does not support Holte's thesis beyond his demonstration of the importance of the parts of the soul, the practical and theoretical reason. Augustine does not derive the meaning of the pair from a Stoic source, but from his own early writings.

Ähnliche Einträge