Usus and Fruitio in Augustine, 'De doctrina Christiana I'

Critique of R. Holte's interpretation (cf. Aph XXIX p.31) of Augustine's use-enjoyment distinction. The text does not support Holte's thesis beyond his demonstration of the importance of the parts of the soul, the practical and theoretical reason. Augustine does not derive the meaning of the pair fr...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur:Oliver O'Donovan
Publié: S.n., s.l., 1982
Volume:33
Pages:361-397
Périodique:The Journal of theological studies
Nombre:2
Format:Article
Sujet:- Biographie > Relations et Sources > Stoïcisme > Stoïcisme
- Oeuvres > Études de vocabulaire/Thèmes > Thèmes - Vocabulaire latin > F > Fruitio - Usus
- Oeuvres > Études de vocabulaire/Thèmes > Thèmes - Vocabulaire latin > U > Usus / Fruito
- Oeuvres > Œuvres doctrinales > De diversis quaestionibus 83 > div. qu. 83
- Oeuvres > Œuvres doctrinales > De doctrina christiana > doc. Chr. 1
- Doctrine > De l'homme à Dieu > Morale > Charité. Amitié > Charité/amour du prochain
Statut:Active
Description
Résumé:Critique of R. Holte's interpretation (cf. Aph XXIX p.31) of Augustine's use-enjoyment distinction. The text does not support Holte's thesis beyond his demonstration of the importance of the parts of the soul, the practical and theoretical reason. Augustine does not derive the meaning of the pair from a Stoic source, but from his own early writings.

Documents similaires