The 'anti-Manichaean' passage in Confessions 3 and its 'Manichaean audience'
This article is an analysis of Confessions 3.6.10 to 3.10.18 to support an argument that many strategies in Augustine's masterpiece are eminently suited to communicate with a Manichaean audience and designed to convince such an audience of the errors of Manichaeism. The passage in question is genera...
Auteur: | Annemaré Kotzé |
---|---|
Gepubliceerd in: |
S.n.,
s.l.,
2008
|
Volume: | 62 |
Pagina's: | 187-200 |
Taal: | Engels |
Tijdschrift: | Vigiliae Christianae |
Nummer: | 2 |
Formaat: | Article |
Onderwerp: | -
Biografie
>
Relaties en Bronnen
>
Manicheïsme. Neo-manicheïsme
>
Manicheïsme gerelateerd aan Augustinus
>
[Anti-manichéisme]
- Werken > Confessiones > Conf. III > Conf. III, 10-18 - Werken > Confessiones > Thema's > [Critique du manichéisme] - Werken > Confessiones > Thema's > [Destinataire] - Werken > Confessiones > Thema's > [Manichéisme] |
Status: | Active |
Samenvatting: | This article is an analysis of Confessions 3.6.10 to 3.10.18 to support an argument that many strategies in Augustine's masterpiece are eminently suited to communicate with a Manichaean audience and designed to convince such an audience of the errors of Manichaeism. The passage in question is generally described as strongly anti-Manichaean, but I argue that the argumentative and emotional tone of the passage combined with the amount of space spent on a few core aspects of Manichaeism make the passage an effective protreptic directed at a specific category of 'Manichaean' readers. |
---|